Strong's Exhaustive Concordance: how to use it

When you read a familiar Bible verse and wonder what the original word really means, Strong's Exhaustive Concordance can help you investigate it. You can look up an English word, find the Hebrew or Greek term behind it, and compare how that term appears elsewhere in Scripture.
The tool is useful, but it is not a magic decoder for biblical languages. Strong's gives you an organized index, a number system, and brief word information. To interpret a passage responsibly, you still need to consider context, grammar, literary genre, and the differences between English translations.
What Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance contains
Strong's Exhaustive Concordance of the Bible was prepared under the direction of James Strong and first published in the late nineteenth century. Its original purpose was to create an alphabetical index of the words in the King James Version, connecting each English word to the places where it occurs in the Bible.
The word “exhaustive” refers to the scope of the index. The work aims to account for every word in the English Bible edition it covers, including repeated words and words that may be represented by different forms in the original languages. It is therefore more than a topical index or a short dictionary.
A traditional print edition commonly includes several related tools:
- An alphabetical concordance listing English words and the verses in which they appear.
- The biblical text or enough of each verse to identify the occurrence.
- Strong's numbers attached to the underlying Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek terms.
- A Hebrew and Aramaic dictionary for Old Testament entries.
- A Greek dictionary for New Testament entries.
- Indexes or reference material that help readers move between English words and original-language entries.
Strong's was built around the King James Version, so its English word list reflects that translation's vocabulary and wording. Modern websites and Bible apps often adapt the numbering system for other translations, but their links may not correspond perfectly to the wording found in the original concordance.
Core idea: Strong's helps you trace where a source-language term appears. It does not decide what that term means in every verse.
That distinction matters because one original-language word can be translated by several English words. The reverse is also true: one English word can represent several different Hebrew or Greek words. A search for “love,” for example, may bring together multiple original terms, each with its own range of meanings and grammatical uses.
How Strong’s numbers connect English words to Hebrew and Greek
A Strong's number is a reference label assigned to an entry in the Hebrew or Greek dictionaries. Numbers beginning with “H” generally refer to Hebrew or Aramaic entries, while numbers beginning with “G” generally refer to Greek entries. A digital resource may display the number with a letter, while a print concordance may show only the number in a language-specific section.
The number is not a secret code embedded in the Bible. It is an indexing system, similar to a catalog number in a library. If a study tool identifies a word as Strong's G26, you can use that label to open the corresponding Greek entry and examine the places where the term is used.
Strong's numbers are especially useful when you do not read biblical Hebrew or Greek. They let you move from an English translation to a consistent reference point. For example, you can:
- Search an English word in a concordance.
- Identify the Strong's number attached to that occurrence.
- Open the Hebrew or Greek entry connected with the number.
- List other passages using the same source-language term.
- Compare how different translations render those passages.
However, the same number does not guarantee that every occurrence has the same meaning. A word may be used literally in one passage and figuratively in another. It may refer to a person, an action, an object, or an abstract idea depending on its setting.
Numbers also do not always represent a single modern linguistic category. Older reference systems sometimes group related forms together or provide separate entries where a modern lexicon might organize them differently. Digital tools may add grammatical tags, parsing information, or links to other dictionaries, but those additions are not identical to Strong's original work.
What the dictionary entries actually tell you
A Strong's dictionary entry usually gives a brief definition or gloss, pronunciation information, and sometimes a short note about the word's origin or usage. These details offer a starting point, not a complete explanation of the word's semantic range.
A gloss is a short English label such as “faith,” “judge,” “world,” or “holy.” It is convenient for identifying an entry, but it is not a full translation that can be inserted into every verse. Treating a gloss as a complete definition can produce conclusions the passage itself does not support.
Strong's may also connect a word to related terms. Such connections can be helpful, but a shared root does not mean that two words have the same meaning. Words that look related etymologically can develop distinct uses, just as English words with similar origins can mean very different things.
How to use Strong’s Concordance step by step
The most reliable approach begins with the passage, not with a word definition. Read several verses around the target word and identify what question you are trying to answer. You might be comparing translations, tracing a repeated term, or investigating why an English Bible uses a particular word.
- Read the passage in context. Consider the paragraph, the surrounding chapter, the speaker, the audience, and the type of writing.
- Choose the exact English word or phrase. Remember that translations may use different wording for the same original-language term.
- Find the verse in Strong's. Use a print concordance or a digital Bible with Strong's links.
- Record the Strong's number. Check whether it is a Hebrew or Aramaic entry in the Old Testament or a Greek entry in the New Testament.
- Review every occurrence selectively. Look at several examples rather than assuming one verse defines the word.
- Compare translations. Differences can reveal grammar, idioms, or interpretive choices, but they do not automatically show that one translation is wrong.
- Return to the original passage. Test whether your observations make sense in that specific sentence and broader section.
Suppose you are studying the word “spirit” in a New Testament passage. A concordance search may show several Greek entries translated “spirit,” “Spirit,” “wind,” or “breath” in different contexts. You would then examine the specific number attached to your verse, check its surrounding passages, and ask how the author is using it there.
Capitalization can also mislead you. English Bibles may capitalize a word to communicate a translator's understanding, especially with references to the Holy Spirit. Capitalization is not a feature of the ancient Greek manuscripts in the same way it appears in modern English editions, so the Strong's entry alone cannot settle every interpretive question.
Practical safeguard: Never build a doctrine from a dictionary gloss alone. Make the passage, its grammar, and its wider biblical setting the controlling evidence.

How to study a biblical word without overreading it
Word studies become more useful when you separate several questions that are often blended together. First ask what the word means in the verse you are reading. Then ask how the same word functions elsewhere. Only after that should you consider broader theological or etymological questions.
Start with the word's use in its sentence
Grammar affects meaning. A noun may be singular or plural, a verb may express a particular tense or voice, and a word may have a different role depending on the case or its relationship to other words. Strong's numbers can identify the general entry, but they do not by themselves explain all grammatical details.
Digital Bible tools often display a morphological tag alongside a Strong's number. This may indicate information such as person, number, gender, tense, mood, voice, or case. Such tags can be valuable, but they depend on the accuracy and conventions of the resource providing them. They should be read as grammatical aids rather than as complete interpretations.
Compare related passages carefully
After examining the target verse, look at other uses of the same word. Ask whether the settings are genuinely comparable. A term used in a legal instruction may not carry precisely the same emphasis in poetry. A metaphor in a prophetic passage may not function like a straightforward statement in a historical narrative.
Useful questions include:
- Who is speaking, writing, or being addressed?
- Is the word literal, symbolic, idiomatic, or part of a fixed expression?
- What words modify or govern it?
- Does the surrounding paragraph clarify the intended sense?
- Does the author repeat the word or contrast it with another term?
- How do several responsible translations represent the sentence?
Frequency can provide helpful evidence, but frequency is not meaning. A word's most common use elsewhere does not automatically control its meaning in your passage. The immediate context has priority.
Distinguish word studies from etymology
One common mistake is assuming that a word's earliest or most basic root determines its meaning in every later use. Languages do not work that way. A word can acquire specialized meanings, broaden, narrow, or become part of an idiom over time.
For example, knowing that a Greek word is related historically to a verb may offer background, but it does not prove that a noun always retains the full action implied by that verb. Strong's brief etymological comments should therefore be treated as background information, not as the main argument for a definition.
Another mistake is the “one English word equals one original word” assumption. Translation is not a simple substitution process. Translators consider syntax, idioms, register, literary style, and the meaning of the sentence as a whole. A single English word may be the best choice in one verse and a poor choice in another.
What Strong’s Concordance cannot tell you
Strong's is valuable because it is accessible, but its limitations are part of using it well. It was not designed to replace a full Hebrew or Greek lexicon, a critical text, a grammar, or a careful translation. Its definitions are concise and can be dated in wording or scholarly assumptions.
It also does not provide a complete account of textual variation. Modern editions of the Hebrew Bible and Greek New Testament may differ in how they present manuscript evidence, and English translations may follow different textual decisions. If a verse is absent, bracketed, or worded differently in another Bible, Strong's cannot by itself explain the entire reason.
The concordance also does not settle pronunciation. English transliterations and pronunciation guides can vary, and a simple pronunciation aid is not the same as hearing the ancient language spoken. Similarly, a Strong's number does not give you the ability to read a Hebrew or Greek sentence independently.
Several limitations deserve special attention:
- It follows a particular English base text. The original concordance is tied to the King James Version, while modern digital adaptations may use other translations.
- It offers brief glosses. Short definitions cannot represent every shade of meaning or grammatical function.
- It may group or separate forms differently from newer resources. Numbering is a reference convention, not a universal linguistic system.
- It does not replace syntax. Knowing a word's entry does not show how the word operates in the sentence.
- It does not prove theological claims. Interpretation requires more than tracing repeated English or Greek terms.
For deeper study, you may consult a modern lexicon, a biblical-language grammar, a translation comparison, and a commentary written by qualified scholars. These resources should be used with attention to their methods and assumptions rather than treated as unquestionable authorities.
How to choose between print, website, and Bible app versions
A print concordance is useful when you want to browse an English word alphabetically and see its occurrences in one place. It encourages slower reading and makes patterns visible, but it can be bulky and may be tied closely to the King James wording.
A website or Bible app is usually faster for repeated searches. You can often click a word, display a Strong's number, compare translations, and open related passages within seconds. The convenience can also encourage shallow searching, so take time to verify which translation, textual base, and reference system the site is using.
Before trusting a digital result, check:
- Which Bible translation is displayed?
- Does the site show the exact word in the verse or only a linked approximation?
- Are Hebrew and Greek forms shown with grammatical information?
- Does the tool distinguish different source-language entries translated by the same English word?
- Are dictionary definitions clearly identified as coming from Strong's rather than from another lexicon?
- Can you open the surrounding verses instead of viewing only isolated search results?
Some apps attach one Strong's number to a whole English phrase or to a translated word that represents several original-language elements. That can be a useful interface choice, but it is not evidence that the phrase is one word in Hebrew or Greek. When the distinction matters, consult the verse's interlinear or grammatical information and compare multiple resources.
Strong's works best as a first-level research tool. It can help you notice patterns, locate passages, and formulate better questions. It becomes less reliable when used as the only source for a disputed translation, a detailed word definition, or a claim about what a biblical author “really meant.”
A careful workflow keeps the tool in its proper place: begin with the passage, use Strong's to trace the relevant term, examine grammar and context, compare translations, and then consult stronger language resources when the question requires greater precision.
Frequently asked questions
Is Strong's Exhaustive Concordance a Bible translation?
No. Strong's is a reference work built around an English Bible text, especially the King James Version in its original form. It indexes English words, points readers to corresponding Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek entries, and provides brief word information. It does not translate the Bible independently or offer a complete replacement for reading a recognized Bible translation.
What do the H and G labels mean in Strong's numbers?
The H generally identifies a Hebrew or Aramaic entry used in the Old Testament section, while G identifies a Greek entry used in the New Testament section. The labels help you distinguish the language and locate the appropriate dictionary entry. They are reference markers, not claims that every occurrence has exactly one fixed English meaning.
Can Strong's Concordance help someone who does not know Hebrew or Greek?
Yes. It lets you trace an original-language term, inspect other passages where it appears, and compare how translations handle it. The tool is most helpful when used as a starting point. Without language knowledge, you should avoid treating a short gloss as a full definition and should give careful attention to grammar and context.
Why can the same Strong's number appear to have different meanings?
A word can have several related senses, and its meaning depends on the sentence, subject, genre, and surrounding words. Translations may also choose different English terms for stylistic or contextual reasons. A Strong's number identifies an entry; it does not require every occurrence to be translated identically or interpreted in exactly the same way.











Leave a Reply